[NewCandle] Image magnetic monopole charge

[Keith Nagel]

Hey Jones,

I'm missing the relationship between monopolar magnetic charge and ball
lightning...

Why do you think they are related?

If monopoles are present in BL, then a magnet ought to affect the motion of
the balls in a obvious fashion. Is that the basis of the claim made in the
work you reference? I have a very vague memory of this work ( the weird
chenobyl connection ) but you'll have to find the ref, I don't remember
anything
about it.

The image magnetic monopole forms _in_ the Bi2Te3 as a consequence of an
electric
charge being present on or near the surface of the material. One could spray
a single polarity charge on to the surface of the material, or using metal
plates put positive and negative charges on opposite sides of the material.
The first would create a true monopole magnetic charge, the second a dipole
magnetic charge matching the signs of the electric charge applied to the
plates of the capacitor. Either situation is anomalous, as the charges are
static in both cases. Detection of _any_ magnetic field in either experiment
would prove the existance of such charges, and in principle one could make
very sensitive magnetic field measurements limited only by the leakage
current
through the capacitor ( said current producing a magnetic field that would
interfere with more sensitive measurement ).

I am sure your experiment would work to create plasma balls, but how would
this
help us to prove the existance of magnetic charges in the material? I
suppose
you might create a large image magnetic monopolar charge with a ball of
unbalanced
electric charge as described by Ken Shoulders, but the dynamic nature of the
ball would preclude any sensitive magnetic measurement to show the magnetic
charge in the material.

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com
[mailto:newcandle-bounces at ipdiscover.com]On Behalf Of Jones Beene
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:00 PM
To: New energy for the new world.
Subject: Re: [NewCandle] Image magnetic monopole charge


K, all





> I'm thinking that a very simple experiment would involve
depositing a metal film on the Bi2Te3, charging it to a high potential, and
looking for the presence of a magnetic field. _Any_ field would be
anomalous. A single charge should create a monopolar magnetic field.

There are a bunch of French and Russian experiments online claiming the
formation of monopoles/ball lightning over a dielectric surface such as
water following cap discharge.

The implication being that the two are one and the same, or at least related
somehow. I can dig up citations at some future date if needed. The Russian
anme is unpronounceable ;-)

So why deposit a metal film at all?

Yes, you need a minimially intrusive conductive pathway, but a film could be
overkill, and may be too intrusive.

Take the Bi2Te3, attach spaced-apart leads from a switched cap, and then
spray a salt water mist on it before discharging the cap - just to see what
happens in the simplest case. This can easily be refined if there is a
slight indication of ball lightning.

The connection of BL and monopoles makes some sense to me, but is not a
given. They have tied this in to Chernobyl, believe it or not.

Jones